(Sarah Kiskadden-Bechtel, MBe, is Executive Director of the The Academy of Aid-in-Dying Medicine. She brings over a decade of expertise in bioethics, public policy, and nonprofit leadership to the Academy’s mission of advancing compassionate end-of-life care.
Her career spans HIV/AIDS prevention, tuberculosis control, and end-of-life autonomy. She holds an MBe from Columbia University and a BA from Bard College, and is Adjunct Faculty at Columbia University’s Masters in Bioethics program, and Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of Voices in Bioethics: An Online Journal. She serves on the IRBs of Carson Tahoe Health and Carthage Area Hospital, and is a member of the Empire State Bioethics Consortium.)
=========================
Last year, the Completed Life Initiative commissioned Sarah J. Kiskadden-Bechtel, MBe to conduct a landscape analysis of common barriers and best practices of medical aid in dying (MAID) in the United States. As a bioethicist with over a decade of experience in end-of-life policy and care, Kiskadden-Bechtel holds a Master of Science in Bioethics from Columbia University and now serves as Executive Director of the Academy of Aid-in-Dying Medicine.
This landscape analysis examines MAID across the 10 states where the practice was legal as of December 2025, plus the District of Columbia. Interviews were conducted with 25 MAID experts with a diverse array of professional backgrounds over a four-month period.
Evaluating 28 years of MAID history, which began with Oregon’s 1997 law, the analysis reveals through interviews, utilization data, and policy documents that legalization alone does not ensure equitable access to MAID. Despite diverse legal approaches and geographies across jurisdictions, consistent barriers emerge across all settings, preventing eligible patients from accessing this end-of-life option.
Main Barriers to Accessing MAID
-
-
- Most providers operate under a “don’t ask, don’t tell” MAID culture, even though there is no law requiring silence.
- MAID is not typically included in medical school curricula, forcing clinicians to re-invent processes independently which results in inconsistent quality standards.
- Many hospices and hospital systems do not support MAID and force terminally ill patients interested in MAID to switch providers at a critical time in their care.
- There is a federal prohibition on Medicare/Medicaid being used for MAID services, and most commercial insurance companies do not cover MAID services.
- Training gaps, institutional prohibitions, the emotional toll, and the time-intensive nature of MAID services contribute to provider shortages and burnout.
- MAID implementation often has better results when there is a waiting period between when the law is passed and when the law goes into effect because jurisdictions have time to organize providers, recruit pharmacies, and clarify law details.
-
In order to make MAID realistically accessible, our recommendations include increasing clinical education on MAID, standardizing goals-of-care conversations with patients to include MAID as one of many end-of-life options, expanding professional infrastructure for MAID practitioners to decrease burnout, recruiting more pharmacies to provide MAID medications, developing hospice partnerships, and creating public awareness campaigns.
As MAID becomes available in additional jurisdictions—which is happening in Delaware, New York, and Illinois in 2026—implementation experiences from existing states offer valuable insights. Right now, MAID implementation is largely dependent on individual commitment instead of systematic, replicable infrastructure. How jurisdictions address the implementation challenges documented in the report will shape how legal authorization translates to meaningful access for all eligible patients who choose MAID as an end-of-life option.
Visit The Academy of Aid-in-Dying Medicine to download the full report.
(Please scroll down to comment, and feel free to share our blog posts with others who may benefit from them.)
Final Exit Network (FEN) is a network of dedicated professionals and caring, trained volunteers who support mentally competent adults as they navigate their end-of-life journey. Established in 2004, FEN seeks to educate qualified individuals in practical, peaceful ways to end their lives, offer a compassionate bedside presence and defend a person’s right to choose. For more information, go to www.finalexitnetwork.org.
Payments and donations are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Final Exit Network is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization.
Enter your email address to receive these posts in your inbox each week:
Thank you, Sarah, for this report. There are no surprises here; those of us in the right-to-die movement have been aware of these impediments to some degree for years. It is really wonderful to have a researched report to clarify and bring them together.
Yikes!
On the other hand, so good to have this extensive review of the situation.
And so glad to know there actually is an Academy of Aid-in-Dying Medicine. Thank you, Ms. Kiskadden-Bechtel.
Interesting eye wash but does not contribute a crumb to solving the problem of Bodily Autonomy in Life and Death. “BALD” The right of the individual to decide when enough is enough and to expect medical SCIENCE to assist them with fulfilling that wish. No politics, no religion, no crackpots, no shrinks, no judges, no personal agendas, just the Basic Human Right to legally exercise control over their own future. It is that simple.
Thank you, Sarah. I’ve been professionally involved with issues related to death and dying for over 50 years and I commend you and your colleagues for your good work. I have forwarded your report to all of my friends and colleagues. Since I live in a RED state, South Carolina, I have no expectation to life long enough to see MAID legalized here. Consequently, I’m planning to stop eating and drinking (VSED) when the time comes, but perhaps obtaining such services in a state with legal MAID may become even more welcoming by then. Please keep up the good work.
Thank you to the Completed Life Initiative (CLI) for sponsoring this work. It’s good to see these issues raised and studied. I was spurred by this post to visit the Web site of the CLI, which I found to be beautifully designed and rendered. However, when I visited the page published Jan 6, 2026, titled “End-of-Life Options in the United States,” I was confused by the conspicuous absence of the DIY option. For all anyone knows, DIY deaths outnumber MAiD deaths. The mission of the CLI as shown on their Web page is: “We cultivate an open dialogue about end-of-life options and provide a supportive and peaceful environment for informed, empowered end-of-life decision making.” Any open dialogue about end-of-life options must include the DIY option. To be informed and empowered about end-of-life decision-making requires knowing that one is free to hasten their own death, and where education and support for that can be found. I know that the chair of the board of the CLI is well-acquainted with FEN. I hope the CLI will review this omission and provide a remedy soon.
Many thanks, Sarah, for contributing this thorough and eye-opening report on the current state of MAID in the United States. It supports The Good Death Society Blog’s mission to educate our readers about “end-of-life challenges and choices.”